Carbon Neutrality vs. Nature-Positive: what’s the difference?

Carbon neutrality and nature-positive are buzzwords in today’s environmental conversations, but they represent very different approaches. Understanding the distinction can shape how we address the challenges ahead.

Carbon neutrality is about balance. It means offsetting the carbon we emit by reducing emissions elsewhere or removing carbon from the atmosphere. While necessary, it’s a reactive approach—a way to stop adding to the problem.

Nature-positive, on the other hand, is proactive. It’s not just about minimizing harm; it’s about creating net benefits for nature. Imagine reforesting an area that was once barren or restoring a wetland to support wildlife.

Nature-positive actions go beyond carbon, addressing biodiversity loss, ecosystem degradation, and the overall health of our planet.

Think of it like this: carbon neutrality is stopping the bleeding, while nature-positive is the healing process. Both are important, but if we want a thriving planet, neutrality alone won’t get us there. It’s time to aim for positive.